North East Sea Angling : NESA  

Go Back   North East Sea Angling : NESA > NFSA / NESFC: Issues affecting YOU > Shore Angling Issues


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2005, 11:33 PM
Doc Doc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Hull
Posts: 83
Default

The golden mile will benefit angling, in that it provides access for anglers to those fish that do get through and are within reach. Many species use the nearshore as migratory corridors, and the nearshore has a wide range of habitats, more so than further offshore. Different habitats have different functions in terms of fish communities, sandy bays often function as juvenile plaice and dab areas, estuaries function as juvenile nursery areas for a range of species including bass, other types of habitat function as feeding areas for both juvenile and adults alike.

Functionality is the important component of inshore areas and consequently the golden mile will protect a significant proportion of these key habitats and the fish that use them.

Cheers


Doc
__________________
If it doesn't bite its not worth catching!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisement



GUESTS - this advertisement block vanishes when you register and log-in. Click here to do so for free.
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-11-2005, 12:19 AM
RobAdair's Avatar
RobAdair RobAdair is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Shields
Posts: 724
Default

The \"Golden Mile\" might stop the netters, but what about the longliners (sandliners)??

How hard would they be to police? (That\'s if they\'re doing anything illegal?) The way I see it is, if the inshore fishing improved, someone, somewhere would exploit it for monetary gain (the only upside being that more informed anglers (ie NESA) would be more aware and hopefully \"shop\" the t*ssers)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 29-11-2005, 02:35 AM
gazzawill gazzawill is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: seaham county durham
Posts: 1,310
Default

i agree with rob on that we as responsable anglers have to pull together on this issue iff you see someone longlining report them . ban the nets to a further distance . the future of shore angling exists on it not just for us fishing the shorelines now. think of the next crop of casters(so to speek) iff my elders never took me fishng what would i be doing now as a pass time ??? drugs / robbing/ steeling it could have been keep the shores alive lol (i am drinking lol ) :P
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2005, 01:27 AM
YoursTruly YoursTruly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 587
Default

Quote:
The golden mile will benefit angling, in that it provides access for anglers to those fish that do get through and are within reach. Many species use the nearshore as migratory corridors, and the nearshore has a wide range of habitats, more so than further offshore. Different habitats have different functions in terms of fish communities, sandy bays often function as juvenile plaice and dab areas, estuaries function as juvenile nursery areas for a range of species including bass, other types of habitat function as feeding areas for both juvenile and adults alike.

Functionality is the important component of inshore areas and consequently the golden mile will protect a significant proportion of these key habitats and the fish that use them.

Cheers


Doc
Doc, i have said this once before the Golden Mile will not help anglers in noth east as the whole coastline is netted off between Roker Pier and South Shields pier. S/S pier is one mile long, you dont need to be a rocket scientist to work that one out.
one other thing you mentioned in a meeting was the 10mtr rule, once again take the ends of both piers and you will find they are both more than 10mtrs deep even at bottom tide.
So in fact the Golden Mile will only help the rest of the country and not the north east.
At the risk of repeating myself , i will say the NFSA will have to be seen to be doing something for anglers here in the north east before any individual will consider paying hard earned cash to join there ranks.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2005, 01:39 AM
sless's Avatar
sless sless is online now
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,855
Default

i totaly agree with you there your\'s truly
__________________
sless
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2005, 10:41 PM
Doc Doc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sunny Hull
Posts: 83
Default

I take your point, but these are the sort of issues we have to include in the dialogue, there is as you rightly say, very little to be gained by implementing any scheme that only benefits anglers in certain parts of the country. However, even if anglers in the NE are still convinced that the NFSA only works for south coast anglers, remember that the south coast also has a number of long piers, Dover breakwater for example. There are also many other areas that have a headland with an adjoining bay, and yes there is the potential for fish to be caught before they hit the beachs, but then that is always going to be the case, we cannot close down the whole of the North Sea, although I\'m sure many would wish that to be the case!!! LOL

If you consider SS pier as an extention of the land then you could expect no netting within a mile of it, rather than just an arbitary 1 mile distance from the shore.

In addition, the 10m depth ruling applies throughout the district, however, as I understand the situation, there is additional protection supposedly in force for the NE, I will try and determine what this is and to what extent it is/not being enforced.


Cheers


Doc.
__________________
If it doesn't bite its not worth catching!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2005, 01:01 AM
YoursTruly YoursTruly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 587
Default

Thanks for that doc, i look forward to your findings.
Terry
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Sponsored links Remove advertisements
Advertisement
Advertisement



GUESTS - this advertisement block vanishes when you register and log-in. Click here to do so for free.
Reply

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
total smoking ban batt22 Chat 125 24-02-2006 04:07 PM
Total Sea Fishing Charlton Chat 2 24-02-2006 02:51 PM
Total Bliss alan Chat 5 12-09-2004 08:35 PM



© Anglers' Net. 1999-2008 | Privacy Policy, Terms & Conditions (Click to view)
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
Ad Management by RedTyger