TONYS FISH

  • Thread starter Thread starter TC
  • Start date Start date
T

TC

Guest
I\'ve been asked by Dave (Mason) to re-post these pix he took on the day of the alleged \"pirking\" incident and that he\'ll give a full & honest account of the events.

OK, Dave......I\'ve posted the pix.........I\'m bracing myself !(what have I left myself in for???.....lol....lol)

tca.jpg


tcb.jpg


tcc.jpg


tcd.jpg



[Edited on 23/3/2004 by TC]
 
Alright Tony , you\'ve suffered enough :P . These are pics of us lot out last year , Tony had a pollack of about 7/8lb on a whole squid followed by a double figure cod ( Weighed minus the mythical pirk :) ) , these were followed by some nice ling also . Best year we have had so far ( not for me like :( ) and Richy and Ell had some gooduns as well .

Mr Cutter has the victim of a smear campaign ( Don\'t know who started it like ah-hem ;) ) and is a upstanding citizen of the highest order . I don\'t know what we will do now Tony :( , who can we frame next .

Just remember the NESA moto - never let the truth get in the way of a good story :) Plenty more fish to come mate , get yer tackle ready .
 
A Pollack of about 78lb Dave :o
Richy and Ell had some gooduns as well

Dear posters, the man is obviously 3 sheets short of a mainsail

P.s notice the lack of a ruler in shot to allow perception of scale. Tony C is actually 78cm tall.

[Edited on 23/3/2004 by Ell]
 
So dave you\'re now claiming it to be either 718lbs or between 7 and 8 hundred pounds. ;)
 
Lol...Lol...Lol.......

Thanks, Dave for (attempting) to clear my name of the previously totally ufounded accusation.....(where DID it come from in the 1st place, I wonder.....lol).

Mark...just 1 word for you, m8....... *Edit: sensored by Admin* lol

Ell.....just to clear up the confusion......Pollack = 6lb, Cod 10lb 4oz
I remember the sizes exactly as they\'re the best I\'ve had. Also, I\'ll have you know that I\'m actually 80cm tall (well, in thick socks anyway)

Dave....you\'re right about last Summers boat trips - best fishin\' I\'ve ever had.


[Edited on 23/3/2004 by TC]
 
methinks that you might end up with the last laugh on this one tony. there\'s a long summer with lots of fish ahead.

It would be a fitting close to the matter to see you land a 20lber (pirk or nee pirk)
 
Cracking fish (and pics) Tony mate jealous as hell as my best is only eight and a quarter pound from the shore and boat (identical). Those that can compete with yours can say something. I personally can not. Yet. :casstet: ;)
 
Lol, Mark....
\"It would be a fitting close to the matter to see you land a 20lber \"

Aye, in me dreams ;)

Jim......beginners luck, m8......honest :o :exclam:
 
Tony,
I`ve read this thread a few times now (just in case I made a mistake) but to my knowledge you still dont point out which ones were weighed without pirks ........ so can we assume that all your fish are inclusive of pirk weight (if we know , then this will make it easier for weigh-ins so long as you register what pirk weight your using before the event) .. :) :) :)
 
I would like to draw the attention of the Honorable member for Cramligton to the opening remarks made by the Honorable member for Nottingham in which it was stated:
\"........Weighed minus the mythical pirk.\"

This indeed, makes it quite clear that no WMD (Weights & Measure Deceptions) were used.
 
Well, from the script it would appear that the alleged \"double figure Cod\" (although we have no proof even of that) was weighed minus the mythical pirk, however there is no positive means to show, and dare i add a serious indication in the negative by lack of inferrence, that the other fish caught were in fact weighd as \"pirked\", is this the way forward?, should we inform the likes of Sea Angler etc that in future all fish weights are to be \"as pirked\" ? .................
 
As my Honourable Friend, the Member for Cramlington, is fully aware, irrefutable proof that no WMD were employed, is impossible to provide (as would, indeed, be the case for any other member finding him/herself in a similar, unusual situation (ie catching fish).
To conclude from the Member for Nottinghams’ omission to state that no WMD were employed (neither covertly or otherwise) in the capture of the other fish, that such WMD were involved, is inaccurate and misleading.
 
so ........... does that mean that you ALWAYS weigh in the pirk. don`t be misguided, if that is the way forward then we will all adjust our scales to suit .... no poblem

:) :) :) :) :)
 
Back
Top