I know I haven't posted for ages (if you've nothing to say, say nothing) but here's a conspiracy theory you may or may not want to buy into:
- there were a number of meetings in February and March regarding the MCZ between St Marys and Coquet. I've heard nothing from those meetings so can't comment on the reaction of the RSA but I suspect we would be under represented.
- Les (loopy) announced that the outcome of these consultations would be published by the end of this year (not far away!).
- today (Bank Holiday Monday) and tomorrow sees the North Sea week, on St Marys supported by the following groups:
NIFCA
I can't see us putting our collective heads above the parapet, can you?
So, if I was one of them ...either a diver or a seal watcher or a bird watcher or a whale protector, I would be looking for any opportunity to forward my case at the expense of any non believer (that's us and, to some extent, Joe Public who are also seen as a nuisance). What better way than to take to defending the sad eyed seal, everyone's favourite, and then cast the angler as the bad guy for disturbing their natural habitat and ruining their courtships et al.
Personally I've never seen a seal on land at St Marys (plenty in the water) so this is a recent phenomena but if we get all the bad press you can forget the reality which is that everything runs away from us - birds, crabs and seals but divers dive with them, on the Farnes they're a tourist attraction and at Eyemouth there's a stall selling food to feed them. When DEFRA have to make a decision regarding the access and restrictions in the MCZ they will be mindful of the fuss made on St Marys and, perhaps, the apathy of the RSA in the procedure.
Perhaps those fussy seal huggers on the Island ain't as daft as we think. Perhaps their high profile moaning will carry more umph than our low profile head in the sand approach.