questions please
- Thread starter sless
- Start date
Red5
Well-known member
Why is there such a lack of affordable housing in our small villages and towns to encourage our youth to stay and work and keep our communities alive instead of encouraging buy to rent, second homes, holiday homes and city commuters who don't (in general) give a fig about their adopted community only the view from their windows. By affordable I mean for a bloke with a wife and 2 kids earning what is the average wage up here of meebe's £12,000 pa.
If we are to have a sea angling licence will the labour party ensure that all the foreign vessels plundering our fish stocks and damaging our sea bed eco systems thru their greed for more fish for less effort are banned from coming into OUR waters.
Will the same boats that gill net our best fishing marks be bannned from doing so?
Will the idiots who dig around the boats and dig commercially at Boulmer be banned from digging there ever again?
If we are to have a sea angling licence will the labour party ensure that all the foreign vessels plundering our fish stocks and damaging our sea bed eco systems thru their greed for more fish for less effort are banned from coming into OUR waters.
Will the same boats that gill net our best fishing marks be bannned from doing so?
Will the idiots who dig around the boats and dig commercially at Boulmer be banned from digging there ever again?
mickthefish
Well-known member
im interested to know if and what the re-stocking/conservation policies will be.( the bare minimum required to justify a licence in my eyes )
if so :-
where are you going to hoy the fish in ?
if so :-
where are you going to hoy the fish in ?
mickthefish
Well-known member
i bet its a secret
Ask him why we are being made to pay for the wrongs of this and previous governments and if a license is imposed and people do turn away from the sport .. what innovative ways will he think of to tax those left to make up the lost revenue!!!
agree with rgf does he have any idea how much the average shore angler spends in a year all ready!!!
agree with rgf does he have any idea how much the average shore angler spends in a year all ready!!!
we were all police checked before and they basically just do the same check but charge us 190 quid instead of the tenner it used to cost also as of march this year we need a cctv operators licence another 190quid and theres more dodgy people working for the police force than there ever was in security lol
insanojackson
Guest
I hope your joking mate, I have been to loads of "inside jobs" involving dodgy guards in my time. Hopefully the registration thing should sort this out a bit.
Yes there are dodgy people in the police same as any other job but there a very very small minority. They do however get lots of media attention when exposed, perhaps why you thing there are more than there actually is?
BriH
Well-known member
Sless ask him
have you ever considered banning all trawl fishing for three years - (we can import frozen at the same price,sometimes cheaper) but then paying the trawlermen a yearly wage based on the average catch last year - which after all would be money in the bank(some months these guys cant get out at all ,so they would be better off - then the stocks would be able to replenish the stocks themselves - i was told mother nature would need 3 years by a Boffin at Durham University,he went through the `mechanics` behind his theory ,and it sounded right
we pay farmers for not farming ,so why not pay trawlermen ??
and they could use the trawl boats for pleasure fisherman ,to make a few more pounds
Its a bit long winded Sless ,but i am sure you get the Gist of it - and he must know some Boffins to check the 3 year thing
Ta
have you ever considered banning all trawl fishing for three years - (we can import frozen at the same price,sometimes cheaper) but then paying the trawlermen a yearly wage based on the average catch last year - which after all would be money in the bank(some months these guys cant get out at all ,so they would be better off - then the stocks would be able to replenish the stocks themselves - i was told mother nature would need 3 years by a Boffin at Durham University,he went through the `mechanics` behind his theory ,and it sounded right
we pay farmers for not farming ,so why not pay trawlermen ??
and they could use the trawl boats for pleasure fisherman ,to make a few more pounds
Its a bit long winded Sless ,but i am sure you get the Gist of it - and he must know some Boffins to check the 3 year thing
Ta
Last edited:
it is not a lifestyle choice m8 lost a high paying job when my kids got taken of ther mam & left with me!!
jamiebrennan
Well-known member
All valid questions but all i would like to know is Why, Where, When and the reasoning behind it?
insanojackson
Guest
Like i said I wasnt referring to you inperticular, I understand your situation. Unfortunately for millions of nerdowells it is a lifestyle choice.
willywetegg
Administrator
As Graham has already asked, what do these questions have to do with fishing.
Maybe if I try to ask on Grahams behalf it would help, I doubt it but I will try.
If you have any questions you would like to ask Mr. Miliband about fishing then please post them here.
If it is not about fishing then please don't bother. I will go through this thread tomorrow and delete anything that is not fishing related. If you have a problem with that then please get in touch with Fern Britton and Phillip Schofield in the morning and they will sort out your problems.
Jim.
Maybe if I try to ask on Grahams behalf it would help, I doubt it but I will try.
If you have any questions you would like to ask Mr. Miliband about fishing then please post them here.
If it is not about fishing then please don't bother. I will go through this thread tomorrow and delete anything that is not fishing related. If you have a problem with that then please get in touch with Fern Britton and Phillip Schofield in the morning and they will sort out your problems.
Jim.
PAUL.S.HARRISON.SNR
Member
more support
more support
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/dir/;_ylt=AvCNwQ6tv0RaktJUoL6yNHoGBgx.?link=list&sid=396545444
try this link same question about miliband others have a voice not all from fishing
more support
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/dir/;_ylt=AvCNwQ6tv0RaktJUoL6yNHoGBgx.?link=list&sid=396545444
try this link same question about miliband others have a voice not all from fishing
Charlie_Thompson
Well-known member
Sless, if you get the chance could you ask him why the commercials are pandered to even when their activities in many people's opinions will very quickly lead to the complete disappearance of Cod from our waters. On the other hand we are being asked to begin paying more money for greater restriction on what we are involved in - a sport / hobby / tradition that has loads of great things associated with it, An intimate appreciation of our coastline and wildlife, an opportunity to relax in peace alone or with like minded friends, the technical challenges of casting and rig tying, wreck drifting and tackle choice, the connections it allows us to make with our kids and other young people away from the problems associated with urban life and commercial pressure. The chance it gives many of us to continue learning and benefit from the experience and stories of anglers older than ourselves. The sheer pleasure of getting home to a cup of tea after enduring sometimes horrendous conditions and demanding treks to get to our marks - And on the odd occasion the complete and utter total buzz the act of actually catching one of the blighters.
You might like to add that Sea anglers contribute vastly more to the economy than the commercial white fish industry, I think its 100's of millions v's a billion plus.
It's fecking madness
My guess is it has something to do with voices of a little gang of professional commercial lobbyists representing the few remaining big boys being heard by The Politicians on account of them hanging out in the same sleazy spots (Parliament and that) the word coming out of working mens clubs and canteens is NEVER listened to because they are NEVER there to hear it.
Cheers, let me know what he says
You might like to add that Sea anglers contribute vastly more to the economy than the commercial white fish industry, I think its 100's of millions v's a billion plus.
It's fecking madness
My guess is it has something to do with voices of a little gang of professional commercial lobbyists representing the few remaining big boys being heard by The Politicians on account of them hanging out in the same sleazy spots (Parliament and that) the word coming out of working mens clubs and canteens is NEVER listened to because they are NEVER there to hear it.
Cheers, let me know what he says
Sless, if you get the chance could you ask him why the commercials are pandered to even when their activities in many people's opinions will very quickly lead to the complete disappearance of Cod from our waters. On the other hand we are being asked to begin paying more money for greater restriction on what we are involved in - a sport / hobby / tradition that has loads of great things associated with it, An intimate appreciation of our coastline and wildlife, an opportunity to relax in peace alone or with like minded friends, the technical challenges of casting and rig tying, wreck drifting and tackle choice, the connections it allows us to make with our kids and other young people away from the problems associated with urban life and commercial pressure. The chance it gives many of us to continue learning and benefit from the experience and stories of anglers older than ourselves. The sheer pleasure of getting home to a cup of tea after enduring sometimes horrendous conditions and demanding treks to get to our marks - And on the odd occasion the complete and utter total buzz the act of actually catching one of the blighters.
You might like to add that Sea anglers contribute vastly more to the economy than the commercial white fish industry, I think its 100's of millions v's a billion plus.
It's fecking madness
My guess is it has something to do with voices of a little gang of professional commercial lobbyists representing the few remaining big boys being heard by The Politicians on account of them hanging out in the same sleazy spots (Parliament and that) the word coming out of working mens clubs and canteens is NEVER listened to because they are NEVER there to hear it.
Cheers, let me know what he says
Excellent mate very well put !!!
Charlie_Thompson
Well-known member
Graham, one cannot say tits in front of a governmetor the word is "bilateral lung unit (milk 0.45) Gender differentiator" s
