the witch is dead

give ya head a shake moron

100 percenti agree m8.there what a pile of ****e:mad:but ps yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiippppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee stinking old big nosed *******,atb plum
 
Just remember "British Jobs for British Workers" All whilst we had a labour goverment and who let them all in to take the british jobs, again a labour goverment.
 
I

I

I have just found this on facebook and wish i ahd the balls and gumption to think of it myself, but i did not, however i agree with this person and proud to say it is my sister

also a far as closing the pits and shipyards and any other industries i beleive it was on a matter of time and they would be closed on their own merit as a lot were losing money as other countries were building ships , producing coal and other goods far qiucker and cheaper than BRITAIN as most countries were multi skilled, eg a ship yard worker once told me he had to wait and virtually stand about for 2 weeks as he waited for a welder to do a five minute job, and also heard from lads in the ship yards that was just 1 of many examples of what went on on a daily basis
 

Attachments

  • 005.jpg
    005.jpg
    93.7 KB · Views: 0
I have just found this on facebook and wish i ahd the balls and gumption to think of it myself, but i did not, however i agree with this person and proud to say it is my sister

also a far as closing the pits and shipyards and any other industries i beleive it was on a matter of time and they would be closed on their own merit as a lot were losing money as other countries were building ships , producing coal and other goods far qiucker and cheaper than BRITAIN as most countries were multi skilled, eg a ship yard worker once told me he had to wait and virtually stand about for 2 weeks as he waited for a welder to do a five minute job, and also heard from lads in the ship yards that was just 1 of many examples of what went on on a daily basis

what a pile of torry propaganda , i worked at the shipyards and it was nothing like your saying , very well organised , and plenty of work , thatcher the destoyer , all so destroyed the ship yards because of her hate of the working class
 
You only dont like her since she put tax on free mackeral

ha ha ha

Grow up Allen the pits and shipyards were well done long before she got into power, i bet you wouldnt like to put your hand in your pockett and keep them going with what was going on


Sean

now now Sean no need to get personal, I am entitled to my opinion and there is a lot of evidence that says the opposite, especially if orders went to British Shipyards and not abroad, this will be my last comment

Taxed me mackerel, was that her, if I had known that I would of blacked her eye
 
Just a wee footnote that seems to have been missed and as a Scot I cannot let it go by unsaid.

Thatcher had record high tax receipts in her premiership from oil revenues which paid for the tax cuts for the rich and the bribes to the "working man" in the shape of council houses for a tenth of their worth and shares in our blue chip nationalised companies that doubled or trebled in price the day after they were bought by "Joe Public."

A wee quote from the hundreds of articles on this issue.


In her first four year term, North Sea revenues contributed £20.3bn to the exchequer – 8pc of the total £258bn of tax receipts over that period, official figures show. Today, as a proportion of the total tax take, that would translate into a £45bn annual windfall – a sum larger than the entire corporation tax bill.

So any talk of financial prudence on her part is way, way short of the mark.
 
Just so the less informed can understand out tax system, make sure you dont let labout tax the wealthy too much as read this and see what can happen

Suppose that once a month, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all of them comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes and claim State benefits, it would go something like this;

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every month and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20." Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free but what about the other six men; the paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realised that £20 divided by six is £3.33 but if they subtracted that from everybody's share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So the bar owner suggested a different system. The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing.
The sixth man paid £2 instead of £3 .
The seventh paid £5 instead of £7.
The eighth paid £9 instead of £12.
The ninth paid £14 instead of £18.
And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59. 
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.

But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got £1 out of the £20 saving," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got £10!"

"Yes, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a £1 too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The rich get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!"

So, the nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. Funnily enough, the next month the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.

But when it came to pay for their drinks, they discovered something important – they didn't have enough money between all of them to pay for even half the bill.

That's how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes do tend to get the most benefit from tax reliefs and reductions. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. Just like when Mrs T reduced the tax on the rich they came home and the country benefited, when Labour upped it again it cost the uk 200 million in lost revenue when they disapeared again!!!!!!!!!!!!

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible
 
Just so the less informed can understand out tax system, make sure you dont let labout tax the wealthy too much as read this and see what can happen

Suppose that once a month, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all of them comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes and claim State benefits, it would go something like this;

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay £1.
The sixth would pay £3.
The seventh would pay £7.
The eighth would pay £12.
The ninth would pay £18.
And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every month and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20." Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free but what about the other six men; the paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realised that £20 divided by six is £3.33 but if they subtracted that from everybody's share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So the bar owner suggested a different system. The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing.
The sixth man paid £2 instead of £3 .
The seventh paid £5 instead of £7.
The eighth paid £9 instead of £12.
The ninth paid £14 instead of £18.
And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59. 
Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.

But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got £1 out of the £20 saving," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, "but he got £10!"

"Yes, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a £1 too. It's unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!"

"That's true!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The rich get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison, "we didn't get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!"

So, the nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. Funnily enough, the next month the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him.

But when it came to pay for their drinks, they discovered something important – they didn't have enough money between all of them to pay for even half the bill.

That's how our tax system works. The people who already pay the highest taxes do tend to get the most benefit from tax reliefs and reductions. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. Just like when Mrs T reduced the tax on the rich they came home and the country benefited, when Labour upped it again it cost the uk 200 million in lost revenue when they disapeared again!!!!!!!!!!!!

For those who understand, no explanation is needed.
For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible


more torry propaganda and a loud of rubish
 
more torry propaganda and a loud of rubish

Shut up you bigoted old cuss...I, and am sure a lot of NESA members, am bored of your one sided vitriol. Do us all a favour and go away to another forum where your cronies will kiss your ass.

Don't bother PMing me either...say what you've got to say on open forum. Hopefully you'll hang yourself and get yourself banned as usual.
 
Shut up you bigoted old cuss...I, and am sure a lot of NESA members, am bored of your one sided vitriol. Do us all a favour and go away to another forum where your cronies will kiss your ass.

Don't bother PMing me either...say what you've got to say on open forum. Hopefully you'll hang yourself and get yourself banned as usual.

just the typical cowardly reply i would expect from you
 
just the typical cowardly reply i would expect from you

Cowardly? why? because I have an open opinion that dares to run contrary to yours? get real...you have sent threats both to myself and other members before now because we have questioned your one sided views openly.

You may be the big man down your way Tony aka Mr TT but I am certainly not intimidated by you.

I don't question your beliefs...indeed if you had the good grace to accept those held by others I would respect them. But you do not...you shout and name call because you have no grace or demeanor. You are a sour old man.
 
Cowardly? why? because I have an open opinion that dares to run contrary to yours? get real...you have sent threats both to myself and other members before now because we have questioned your one sided views openly.

You may be the big man down your way Tony aka Mr TT but I am certainly not intimidated by you.

I don't question your beliefs...indeed if you had the good grace to accept those held by others I would respect them. But you do not...you shout and name call because you have no grace or demeanor. You are a sour old man.

see you are trying your best to ge me banned, which you were good at on other forums banning any one who spoke against you , now you have shown all on here your a GRASS as well as a coward
 
the witch is dead

Hope tony Blair gets the same as Thatcher as both are like all politicians only interested in what in it for themselves and their hangers on.
 
This thread is getting boring now :rolleyes:

Yes it is Chris and I am annoyed at myself for getting sucked into it. The general theme of it offends me.

I am not pro Thatcher...FFS I was two years old when she came into office! The miners strikes were blurred tv memories.

What offends me is people that cannot be reasonable and listen to the views of others without resorting to insults.

She has polarized a lot of opinions and the reasons for that are clear on both sides...but I am bored to the high teeth of one man and his self appointment as the high priest of the working man.

Tony you bring the worst out in me but I am very happy with how I am perceived thanks. If you have been banned here or elsewhere it was of your own doing.

This is my last word in what is a god awful and tasteless thread.
 
Yes it is Chris and I am annoyed at myself for getting sucked into it. The general theme of it offends me.

I am not pro Thatcher...FFS I was two years old when she came into office! The miners strikes were blurred tv memories.

What offends me is people that cannot be reasonable and listen to the views of others without resorting to insults.

She has polarized a lot of opinions and the reasons for that are clear on both sides...but I am bored to the high teeth of one man and his self appointment as the high priest of the working man.

Tony you bring the worst out in me but I am very happy with how I am perceived thanks. If you have been banned here or elsewhere it was of your own doing.

This is my last word in what is a god awful and tasteless thread.

you bring the worst out of me , all i have done is stand up for what i believe in , if i do get banned i would say you personally had a hand in it and every one can see that , and i aint sour, our lass said i was well tasty this morning lmfao
 
This is my last word in what is a god awful and tasteless thread.

I 100% agree with that but she didnt deserve the stuff people have said of here, she stood up to men who would of seen this country go bust she made this country great again

whether everything she did was right or wrong she deserves better than the name calling she has had, i worked in the shipyards, and seen the orders disapear overseas and then i went overseas to build them, abroad the difference was in europe you had to work as if you didnt you were bagged in this country you didnt have to work as the union kept your job and to be honest i did well in europe. why is the new manurfacturing doing so well and so are the workers, again its so easy to see its not run by unions.

I am out of here now as this thread has run its course but on a final note we had a survey the other day at work asking if you agreed with her the ones who said yes are getting wednesday off with pay the others are having to work thier faces has been a picture and as the bosses say you didnt agree so you dont need to say farewell ha ha ha


Sean
 
Back
Top